I can't believe it's already Labor Day. No, scratch that. I can't believe it's already past Labor Day. When we were kids and everyone told us time flies when you're older, well they weren't lying that's for sure. But, before I digress into the irony of weekday wishing for the weekend and inadvertently wishing your life away, this post is the Big Book Summer Challenge Wrap up. Back, right after Memorial Day (distant times, years long gone) I posted about the 2018 Big Book Summer Challenge and tasked myself with reading four big books. To qualify as a big book, the length has to surpass 400 pages. My list included:
So how'd I do?
About that well. I managed to finish Leviathan Wakes, and I honestly, truly enjoyed it. I'll definitely be continuing the series when I work through the rest of my backlog/never ending TBR pile. I didn't, however, get through the remainder of my goal.
I started two books that qualified as big books but were not on my list above. Unfortunately, I got about 68% through both and finally put them in the did-not-finish category. I know. . . I know. If I got that far, why didn't I just finish them? To be honest? I just wasn't enjoying them. Neither were bad books per say, one is even very well known and raved about, I just couldn't bring myself to keep trying to read them. It got to the point where I was slowly turning pages just to try and mark them down as done. So I stopped.
The bad news? I only read one big book this summer. The good news? I just started Dune and it really seems like what I need at the moment.
I stumbled upon the Big Book Summer Challenge via friends over at WildmooBooks, and because I'm a sucker for lists and tracking any sort of anything I promptly said - you need to do this. The basic premise of the challenge is to read at least one book over 400 pages between Memorial Day and Labor Day. I'm a little behind seeing as I missed the starting gun and have several books that I'm currently working through. So my plan is to jump into the challenge as soon as I'm done with these current reads. I have a decent stretch of time off in July so I'm hoping that will make up for the time lost in June.
My goal for the 2018 Big Book Challenge is 4, evenly split between fiction and non-fiction.
In no particular order (though I do think I'm going to start with Leviathan Wakes because I've been wanted to read it for quite awhile now) the books I'm going to attempt to read for this challenge are:
So, can I get them done? Who knows. But it's going to be fun to try!
Tori! I’m so excited to chat. I know you, but for everyone who doesn’t, tell us who you are and what you have going on.
My name is Victoria-Lynn Bell, and I’m the current Editor-in-Chief of The Helix magazine. The Helix is a completely undergraduate-run literary and art magazine on the Central Connecticut State University campus. Since its first publication in 1977, The Helix has published one magazine every academic semester. We accept literature and art from all over the globe; our latest edition features writing from our own students here at CCSU as well as pieces from India, Turkey, and New Zealand!
That is an impressively far reach. Congratulations on being able to work with such a diverse population of writers. What’s the editorial process like on your side of the table? What’s one thing that makes a submission jump out at you?
Finding quality submissions is the best part of this job. Our team is not looking for anything in a specific style or genre. What really draws us in is a strong lead to a piece or a poem and attention to detail and craft. We look for pieces that we haven’t seen before, something unique and executed well. When an author marries originality and quality, you know you’ve found a true gem.
And when you find that gem I bet it’s amazing. On the flipside, is there anything that is an immediate disqualifier?
Not reading through the submission guidelines. This is something that has nothing to do with the quality of the writing or the artwork, but unfortunately causes some of our submissions to go unopened. If we receive multiple pieces in one document or open a poem that’s formatted in papyrus font for example, we reject the submission and encourage the submitter to try again when they’ve adjusted their piece. Reading through submission guidelines shows us that the artist or author is serious about their work appearing in our magazine.
Which they should be. In your time at Helix, what has been something that you’ve learned that you wish you had known when you started?
Something I didn’t expect was how long it would take up to go through our submission queue. I’ve heard horror stories about publishing companies with tangible slush piles—mountains of submissions that teeter by intern desks and constantly shift like a mud slide—and working at a literary mag is a micro version of that. Our Submittable portal opened about a year ago, and it was more successful than we had anticipated. In an effort to make sure authors didn’t have to wait more than eight months to hear back about their submission, we had to read through a lot of pieces each week.
Was there anything that was sort of eye-opening? Seeing things from the editor’s chair versus behind the writer’s screen?
As a writer, I’m constantly struggling to find ways to improve my pieces. It hard to see the strengths of your own writing when you scrutinize it so closely. During an initial read of a piece I’m reviewing for the magazine however, I find that I fall into a natural balance of enjoying the piece and analyzing whether it will work for The Helix. Seeing what works and what doesn’t work in other’s writing has helped me make decisions with my own craft.
So what would be the most challenging part of the job?
Being Editor-in-Chief is like being a spokesperson, a ringmaster, and an editor all in one. Juggling tasks is the most challenging part of the job. You have to be great at communication and knowledgeable about running a team of editors while communicating with authors and artists. In the weeks leading up to publication, I can be emailing our faculty advisor, meeting with the graphic designer, and editing pieces in the same day.
An impressive feat. Kudos. Taking a step away from the editor’s role, are you working on any projects in your downtime?
When am I not working on a project is a better question! But in all seriousness, I have a few things in the works, including a novel and a collection of poetry and nonfiction essays.
So, I have a very important question. What’s your weapon of choice in the zombie apocalypse?
What am awesome question! My weapon of choice would be a bow and arrows. In a fight-or-flight situation I tend to always flee if I can. A bow and arrows would mean I could protect myself from a distance while still looking completely bad ass. Think Robin Hood meets Daryl from The Walking Dead.
Okay, so before you go, rapid fire time. Answer without thinking. Ready? Set. Go!
Yeah, that is a God-awful word. Thanks for dropping in and shedding some light on the process of being an editor-in-chief. Congratulations with the success you’ve had with Helix and I can’t wait to read more of your work. Where can people get in touch with you if they want to find out more?
I have an Instagram @indexblog and blog tinybitofeverything.net and can be reached through my email email@example.com
Wow does time fly by. It seems like I was just here doing this exact same thing! Well, regardless, this week's short story choice was Gray Wings by Karl Bunker. Taking place at some point between the not-so-distant and still-kind-of-far-away future, Gray Wings follows a flyer competing in an aerial race. Think wing suits but surgically attached and connected.
While competing in this qualifying race, she gets caught in the draft of a plane and crashes down on an impoverished nation that is the stark opposite from the place she grew up. *Side note - I read this story prior to the "shit-hole nations" tweet that was spoken with such class and sophist--ugh, I can't even be sarcastic about this stuff anymore. Anyway, now that I'm revisiting this story after that incident, it's relevance has been renewed and it goes to show that good quality science fiction (and fiction in general) illustrates aspects of our lives and the world that we may not see all the time.
So, in the story, our flyer crashes down and befriends a son and his mother who live on a struggling farm. Repeated offers of money in exchange for assistance go unanswered, illustrating the noble, yet sometimes harmful characteristic of pride. And while that is one side of the coin, the other side that the reader can take away from these interactions is the very real barrier (though invisible) between people from different cultures, backgrounds, and lives. Things one person takes for granted could be something another individual scratches and claws for.
Though first being published almost half a decade ago, Gray Wings is still so relevant it could have been written and published yesterday. It was a great short story that captured and illustrated a side of humanity that still needs so much work. I strongly recommend people read it for the timeliness. Clarkesworld Magazine reprinted the story in 2016 and it can be read (or listened to) for free here: http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/bunker_03_16_reprint/
And that's it for this week's short story reflection (review?) I'm still trying to figure out what I want to call this endeavor. Maybe I'll have it figured out next week when I talk about Lynn Coady's short story Play the Monster Blind out of The Penguin Book of Contemporary Canadian Women's Short Stories which I picked up in Halifax either last year or the year before. Taking a break from the science fiction and fantasy side of things, this short story was extracted from Lynn Coady's 2000 collection of the same name. See you all next week!